The WTO is a collection of 160 countries that cooperate on international trade matters under negotiated rules, and is overseen by an administrative system based in Brussels, Belgium.
According to a note by the Secretariat of the World Trade Organisation, China allowed the dispute to lapse, having initially bought it in late 2016, requesting consultations with the European Union concerning certain provisions of the EU regulation pertaining to the determination of normal value for “non-market economy” countries in anti-dumping proceedings involving products from China.
Hearings on the issue began within WTO in late November 2017 and, at the time, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer testified before Congress that this issue is the “most serious litigation that we have at the WTO right now,” noting, “I have made it very clear that a bad decision with respect to the non-market economy status of China…would be cataclysmic for the WTO.”
China lost an interim ruling on the matter last year after the WTO rejected the argument that Beijings 2001 agreement to join the WTO automatically granted it the right to be treated as a market economy in anti-dumping investigations after 15 years.
The United States and the EU said Chinese goods—especially commodities such as steel and aluminum—were still heavily underpriced because of subsidies and state-backed oversupply, giving Chinese exporters an unfair advantage.
The row had become an explosive issue for the United States, with Read More – Source