Commentary: Life after COVID-19 — fashion’s excesses curbed, shopping habits forever changed

LONDON: Not since 1939 have the worlds of fashion and luxury so completely ground to a halt. Stores are closed, orders cancelled, factories shut or repurposed to make personal protective equipment (PPE).

The summer fashion shows have been called off, and it looks increasingly unlikely the September fashion weeks will go ahead — brands such as Saint Laurent and Tory Burch have already cancelled their shows.



No question, the COVID-19 pandemic has ushered in a reckoning for the £2.2 trillion (US$2.74 trillion) fashion and luxury industries — much of it around sustainability (and fashions lack thereof).

What will emerge? Could a more responsible sector — one less damaging to the environment, that goes further to ensure the welfare of its workforce — materialise in its wake?

READ: Commentary: The great COVID-19 race for protective medical gear and ventilators

READ: Commentary: In Singapore, laws are necessary for trickle-down policies to work




Environmentalists are certainly hoping so. The fashion industry has been making far too much for far too long.

Clothing production has become so cost-effective at scale that brands would rather over-manufacture by 30 to 40 per cent than risk running out of stock.

Much of that excess ends up incinerated or in landfills — Burberry famously burnt £28.6 million in bags, clothes and perfume in 2017 to prevent them from being stolen or sold for too little (a practice it has since halted).

Since Europe went into lockdown, designers and executives from Giorgio Armani to Vetements Guram Gvasalia have been calling for change. They want their peers to produce less and less often.

FILE PHOTO: People stroll at the shopping district "Hohe Strasse", as the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) continues in Cologne, Germany, April 22, 2020. REUTERS/Thilo Schmuelgen

They want customers to buy more at full-price, and are petitioning retailers to realign the sales calendar so that summer sandals and dresses are discounted at the end of the season, in late September, rather than June. (Right now, flush with excess inventory, they are holding sales earlier than ever.)

They are asking for an end to retail contracts where designers are not given order deposits or security, and which leave designers financially liable for what stores cant sell at full price.


Many of these demands are wishful thinking. Independent designers will not secure better terms with retailers, who will be more beholden to creditors and big brands — and less able to make risky bets on lesser-known names — than before.

READ: Commentary: Has COVID-19 made e-commerce and online shopping the new normal?

READ: Commentary: Give workers permission to disrupt – one way Singapore businesses can accelerate digital transformation

Nor will suppliers obtain better terms with designers — with so few orders coming in, brands will be asking for discounts, and they will get them. Garment workers will in turn find it even more difficult to secure a living wage.

Changes under way prior to the pandemic will accelerate. The big luxury brands, backed by even bigger conglomerates — namely LVMH and Kering — will rebound first and capture even more market share.

The few globally recognised names that maintained their independence in the wake of the 2008 crisis — Prada, Ferragamo, Burberry, Tods — may take a look at their balance sheets and reconsider.

Department stores will continue to consolidate and disappear — not just in North America, but perhaps also in Europe, which is more dependent on tourists.

Chinese shoppers, who were already shopping more at home following VAT cuts and a crackdown on daigou (personal shoppers who import luxury goods into China without paying duties), will be more likely to buy an Hermès bag in Shanghai than Paris or Hong Kong.

READ: Commentary: Even China is sticking to a semi-formal lockdown.

READ: Commentary: Life in China after COVID-19 lockdown gives normal new meaning

Brands will close stores in capital cities and tourist destinations as a result.


It wont be all doom and gloom. Fashions impact on the environment — the amount of carbon it produces, the millions of litres of dye that pollute the worlds waterways, its contributions to soil erosion and biodiversity loss — will drop sharply this year.

Labels will produce fewer, smaller collections over the next few quarters, even years. Having seen the risks of a global supply chain, American brands will reinvest in local manufacturing, furnishing new jobs and skills.

Seasonal trends will continue to disappear as designers focus more on classic items that can be worn year-round — and stay on store shelves longer.

The shift to more restrained, timeless pieces will ultimately give way to exuberance and excess — just as wartime fabric rationing paved the way for Diors New Look in 1947, and the 2008 financial crisis set the stage for Alessandro Micheles Gucci debut in 2015.

A model presents a creation from the Salvatore Ferragamo Autumn/Winter 2020 collection during Milan Fashion Week in Milan, Italy, on Feb 22, 2020. (Photo: REUTERS/Alessandro Garofalo)

READ; Commentary: Singapores aviation and tourism recovery will be very slow after COVID-19 but long-term outlook remains bright

Fashion shows will get a much-needed overhaul. Already, the volume of resources poured into 10-minute shows — sometimes involvingRead More – Source