Iran answers Trumps maximum pressure with maximum resistance

Asphyxiated by US sanctions, Iran has been scaling back its commitments under the 2015 nuclear deal in a bid to demonstrate the ineffectiveness of US President Donald Trump's maximum pressure policy.


Read more

Over the past few months, Tehran has been steadily turning its back on the terms of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), better known as the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. On Thursday, November 7, uranium enrichment resumed at Irans underground Fordo facility, marking the fourth phase of a disengagement strategy that began on May 8 in response to the unilateral US withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal.

The announcement came as Iran cancelled the accreditation of an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspector who was prevented from entering the Natanz nuclear facility last week.

Iran alleged the inspector tested positive for suspected traces of explosive nitrates. The IAEA, which is the UN's nuclear watchdog, disputed Tehrans claim.

Tensions between Tehran and Washington have been rising since Trump pulled out of the nuclear deal last year despite IAEA assurances that Iran was in compliance with the terms of the multilateral agreement. Iran has warned that it will resume nuclear activities outside the JCPOA following successive waves of crippling US sanctions that has blocked Irans oil exports, damaged its currency and its access to products such as medicines.

On Thursday morning, Irans atomic energy agency said it had successfully injected uranium gas into 1,044 centrifuges at Fordo in the presence of IAEA inspectors. The centrifuges had previously spun empty under the terms of the 2015 deal.

"This is an important decision, the Iranian authorities are taking a new step forward, because with the Fordo site, which has more than 1,000 centrifuges, Iran has just significantly increased its uranium enrichment capacity," said Siavosh Ghazi, an Iran correspondent at FRANCE 24s sister radio station, RFI. “This means that Tehran is determined to go even further to accelerate its nuclear programme, since enrichment capacity has reached the level of before the 2015 agreement," he added.

The US, for its part, criticised the decision, warning of grave consequences. "Iran's expansion of proliferation-sensitive activities raises concerns that Iran is positioning itself to have the option of a rapid nuclear breakout," US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a statement. "It is now time for all nations to reject this regime's nuclear extortion and take serious steps to increase pressure."

Pompeos statement made no reference to Trump's decision to leave the deal in May 2018, which sparked the crisis.

Crossing yellow, but not red, lines

The Trump administrations maximum pressure strategy was designed to force Iran to return to the table to negotiate a new deal. But it has failed to pressure the country to negotiate a new, more comprehensive and binding agreement, while mediation attempts, particularly by France, have remained unsuccessful.

"By gradually disengaging from certain clauses of the 2015 agreement, Iran is seeking to get the US to ease sanctions, and then, perhaps, Tehran will say it is ready to discuss again," explained FRANCE 24's international affairs expert Bruno Daroux. “Its a defensive strategy, a kind of maximum resistance to the policy of maximum pressure led by the Trump administration."

But while Tehran has been steadily crossing yellow lines, it has not yet crossed the 5% uranium enrichment red line.

IAEA spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi told reporters on Thursday that Fordo's centrifuges will gradually increase in capacity until Saturday morning, when they will produce uranium enriched to 4.5%. This is the maximum enrichment rate to which Iran has limited itself since July, above the 3.67% ceiling set by the 2015 Iran nuclear deal.

Uranium enriched up to 5% is used as fuel for nuclear power plants, while 20% enriched uranium is used to fuel research reactors. Weapons-grade uranium needs to be enriched to 90% or more. But paradoxically, it is much faster, through leverage, to increase from 5% to 20% and from 20% to 90% than from 0 to 3.67%.

A response to Europes inaction

Tehrans maximum resistance strategy is also aimed at forcing European signatories to the Iran nuclear deal (France, Britain and Germany together witRead More – Source